LONDON, Jan 14 (Reuters) - Western governments
are watching potential new
flashpoints in Yugoslavia with anxiety but with
little idea of how to cope with the most
menacing problem -- Kosova.
Two sullen handovers on Thursday will highlight
other troublespots which could trigger
fresh conflict -- Eastern Slavonia and Montenegro.
Eastern Slavonia reverts to Croatian rule
after two years of United Nations administration,
with thousands of Croatian refugees chafing to
reclaim their homes from nervous Serbs.
And in Montenegro, Serbia's smaller sister republic
in rump Yugoslavia, defeated
President Momir Bulatovic reluctantly hands over
power to his elected successor, Milo
Djukanovic, while actively trying to destabilise
his pro-Western government.
Djukanovic, strongly supported by the United
States, poses the first serious challenge to
Slobodan Milosevic's authority over the residual
Yugoslav federation. Rivalry among the
Bosnian Serbs is also a worry for Western governments
as they discuss a new mandate
for a continued NATO-led peacekeeping force in
Bosnia.
But NATO officials and independent analysts
say it is Kosova, a Serbian province where
ethnic Albanians outnumber Serbs nine to one
but are denied autonomy, which holds the
greatest potential for an explosion.
Since mid-December, NATO's policy-making
council has been receiving weekly
intelligence briefings on the deteriorating situation,
a NATO source said.
"People are beginning to realise that Kosova
risks exploding," the source said. "The
Kosovars have acquired large numbers of weapons
from last year's chaos in Albania. The
Serbian police have effectively lost control
in most of the countryside, especially at night.
Kosova now has much more potential than Bosnia
to ignite a regional confrontation."
Efforts by Western governments to draw
Milosevic into negotiations on Kosova have so
far been rebuffed by Belgrade, which regards
the issue as purely internal.
France and Germany were cold-shouldered
when they wrote to Milosevic in November
asking to join talks on autonomy for Kosova to
"put an end to the international isolation of
the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia" -- a hint
of linkage with a lifting of remaining financial
sanctions against Belgrade. Yugoslavia stormed
out of a Bosnian peace conference in
Bonn last month because the final document referred
to Kosova. Milosevic rose to power
in the late 1980s on a wave of Serbian nationalist
anger over Kosova, stripped of its
autonomy in 1989, which set in motion the break-up
of Yugoslavia. Western officials say
they are concerned that the moderate leader of
the ethnic Albanians, Ibrahim Rugova, is
being undermined by lack of progress, and the
shadow Kosova Liberation Army (KLA)
guerrilla group is gaining ground by killing
Serbs and attacking police stations.
James Gow, an expert on the Balkans at
the Centre for Defence Studies at King's
College, London University, said Kosova was "now
a very dangerous place, a potential
flashpoint becoming more likely by the day, although
it's impossible to predict which day".
Michael Williams, senior fellow at the
International Institute for Strategic Studies, said
there was a growing risk of a Palestinian-style
"intifada" (uprising) by ethnic Albanians. The
NATO source said there was concern that the violence
could give Milosevic a pretext for
declaring a state of emergency and imposing martial
law.
Some diplomats fear a "nightmare scenario"
in which violence could suck in neighbouring
Macedonia and Albania, and even feuding NATO
allies Greece and Turkey.
Others are less concerned, saying the ethnic
Albanians have no record of revolt and lack
the territorial army units or police force that
were the nucleus of rebel forces in Slovenia,
Croatia and Bosnia. But NATO officials and independent
analysts agree the new Balkan
tensions are interlinked. If Djukanovic succeeds
in liberalising Montenegro and loosening
Milosevic's grip, he could embolden the Kosova
Albanians, they said.