GREEK HELSINKI MONITOR
(Greek National Committee of the International
Helsinki Federation)
& MINORITY RIGHTS GROUP - GREECE
(Greek Affiliate of Minority Rights Group International)
P.O. Box 51393, GR-14510 Kifisia, Greece; tel.
30-1-620.01.20; fax: 30-1-807.57.67;
e-mail: office@greekhelsinki.gr
web site: http://www.greekhelsinki.gr/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESS RELEASE
Topic: Open letter to Yugoslav authorities protesting efforts to restrict independent media
We distribute the latest release of Human Rights Watch
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPEN LETTER
Human Rights Watch
350 Fifth Ave. 34th floor
NY, NY. 10118
Telephone: 212-216-1270
Facsimile: 212-736-1300
E-mail: Abrahaf@hrw.org
OPEN LETTER
For Release on February 16, 1998
To: Yugoslav President Slobodon Milosevic
fax 38111-3111668
Serbian President
Milan Milutinovic
fax 38111-684679
Yugoslav Minister
of Foreign Affairs Zivadin Jovanovic
fax 38111-681572
Yugoslav Min.
of Transport and Telecommun. Dojcilo Radojevic
fax 38111-3244414
Serbian Minister
of Information Radmila Milentijevic
fax 38111-685937
Yugoslav Secretary
for Information Goran Matic
fax 38111-600446
February 16, 1998
Dear Sirs:
Human Rights Watch, the largest U.S.-based
human rights organization, condemns your
government's ongoing attempts to restrict the
independent media in the Federal Republic
of Yugoslavia (FRY). Your consistent unwillingness
to establish a clear and democratic set
of laws to regulate the electronic media violates
your government's obligations under
Serbian, Yugoslav, and international law to guarantee
freedom of the press and freedom
of expression.
The open bid for temporary radio
and television frequencies, announced on February 6,
only complicates the matter. Like the laws regulating
the electronic media, the legal
procedures for the open bid are confusing, inconsistent,
and in contradiction with other
Serbian and Yugoslav laws. For example, only
companies that are registered with the
Ministry of Information and the Commercial Court
may submit a bid. But this requirement
contradicts Serbian law since, according to the
Law on Radio Television, a company first
needs a frequency in order to register with these
bodies. The cost of participating in the
bid, the technical conditions required, and the
documents needed from other government-
run agencies are insurmountable barriers for
the private radio and television stations that
exist in FRY.
Human Rights Watch views the most
recent open bid as a continuation of the
government's policy to deny, through complicated
and unduly burdensome legal
procedures, frequencies to those radio and television
stations that do not conform to the
state's narrow definition of "acceptable information."
These stations are allowed to operate,
thereby demonstrating to the international community
an apparent respect for free speech.
But, as the past has demonstrated, the government
may close down a private radio or
television station without a licence at any time.
An estimated 300 private radio stations and
100 private television stations in FRY are currently
in this precarious position. In contrast,
government-run stations or commercial stations
with close ties to the government, like
Radio Kosava or BKTV, have consistently obtained
licences and are free to broadcast
without interference.
In mid-1997, for example, the government
closed seventy-seven independent,
opposition-run or commercial television and radio
stations on the basis that they were
"illegal." Many of the stations did not posses
the proper licenses, in fact because the
government consistently refused to grant licenses
to stations that broadcast critical views
of the state.
Human Rights Watch therefore calls on the FRY government to:
* To prepare new media laws and regulations,
in full consultation with the independent
media in Yugoslavia, that guarantee freedom of
expression in television and radio.
Concrete changes in the Serbian Law on Radio
Television, the Serbian Law on
Communication Systems, the Serbian Laws on Public
Information, the Federal Law on
Communication Systems, and the Federal Law on
Public Information should guarantee
that broadcast licenses are distributed and regulated
by an independent body without
regard to political considerations.
* Until a new series of federal and
republican laws are introduced, permit all currently
licensed, and all unlicensed but currently operating,
radio and television stations to
broadcast without interference. No regulation
of the airwaves should take place until
Yugoslavia has a new set of media laws and regulations
that guarantee free expression in
accordance with international standards.
* Consult with the independent media
and its organizations, such as the Association of
Independent Electronic Media (ANEM), on a regular
basis about ways to protect and
promote the independent media.
Human Rights Watch will continue
to monitor the development of FRY's media
legislation and its application. We note that
freedom of the media is a fundamental
requirement for lifting the outer wall of sanctions
currently in place against FRY and
reintegrating the country into the international
community.
Yours,
[signed]
Holly Cartner
Executive Director
Europe and Central Asia Division
cc: Richard Miles, United States Embassy
in Belgrade
Robert Gelbard,
U.S. Special Envoy to the Balkans
Bronislav Geremek,
OSCE Chairman-in-Office
Robin Cook, E.U.
Council of Ministers
U.N. Special Rapporteur
on Human Rights in the former Yugoslavia
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH BACKGROUND
The Electronic Media in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
The broadcast media in Serbia is
regulated by five laws: the Serbian Law on Radio and
Television, the Laws on Connection Systems (Serbian
and federal), and the Laws on
Public Information (Serbian and federal). In
addition, a number of state bodies are involved
in regulation, including the Ministry of Transport
and Telecommunications, the Ministry of
Information and the commercial courts. Many of
the relevant laws and regulations are
contradictory and allow the government to grant
or deny licenses to those stations it
desires. For example, under current regulations,
the Yugoslav Ministry of Transport and
Telecommunications requires applicants for a
broadcast license to provide proof that the
station has been registered as a public media
outlet at the Ministry of Information and at
the appropriate commercial court. But these documents
cannot be obtained without first
having a license from the Ministry of Transport
and Telecommunications. Even taken
individually, Serbia's broadcast laws do not
guarantee that licenses will be allocated on a
non-discriminatory basis. Article 5 of Serbia's
Law on Radio and Television gives the
government a very broad discretional right to
grant licenses, while article 10 (6) of the
same law allows the government to revoke licenses
under vague terms. Article 7 of the
law obliges the government to hold an open auction
for frequencies once a year, but the
last auction was held in 1994.
As a result, since 1989 independent
radio and television stations (like Radio B-92 or
Radio Boom 93) have been repeatedly denied a
license without an explanation even
though they apparently met all of the criteria,
while stations that were either blatantly pro-
Milosevic or, at least, commercial and wholly
uncritical (like RTV Pink or BK TV) easily
obtained licenses for large parts of Serbia.
The most extreme example was Radio Kosava,
run by Milosevic's daughter, Marija, which obtained
a frequency by government decree
without even submitting an application.
The independent broadcast media was,
therefore, severely limited in its effectiveness,
leaving the state controlled television and radio
to disseminate government propaganda
unchallenged, as in the past. Many people in
Serbia and abroad blame the state media for
encouraging the war in former Yugoslavia by distorting
facts and promoting xenophobic,
extreme nationalist views.
Despite these barriers, Serbia's
independent radio and television stations played an
important role during the 1996-97 demonstrations
by disseminating information, often
directly from the streets, that offered an alternative
to government propaganda. Unlike
during the war, which was never fought inside
Serbia, audiences could contrast the state
media's coverage with their daily experiences
at home. The daily audience of the larger
stations, specifically Radio B-92 and Radio Index
in Belgrade, rose to over one million.
Smaller stations throughout Serbia rebroadcast
B-92's transmission, thus providing many
people in the countryside with an alternative
to the state-run media, which was
misrepresenting the purpose and scale of the
demonstrations. In acknowledgment of their
effectiveness, the government attempted to ban
or close a large number of radio stations,
including Radio B-92 itself, which responded
by sending daily news over the Internet.
Most often, the state justified the
closures by claiming that the station in question did not
have the proper license to broadcast. In most
cases, this was true, a consequence in large
part of the government's persistent refusal to
grant such licenses to independent radio or
television stations. Many of the stations that
were closed following the November 1996
elections, all of them either independent or
oppositional, had been operating without
interference for the past three or more years,
suggesting that they were closed strictly for
political reasons.
In May 1997, the Serbian Minister
of Information, Radmila Milentijevic, promised that
there would be democratic reform in the electronic
media and that no private television or
radio station would be shut down before the September
21 elections. Despite this, on June
2, the Yugoslav Minister for Transport and Telecommunications,
Dojcilo Radojevic,
announced the need to "establish order in the
broadcast media." All "pirate" radio and
television stations, he declared, would be permanently
banned if they failed to apply for a
temporary broadcast license by June 30, 1997.
However, the ministry did not clarify which
documents were required to apply for a temporary
license or on what criteria applications
would be considered. According to journalists
and the Association of Independent
Broadcast Media, a local network of independent
radio and television stations, the
procedure at that time for submitting the application
was confusing and contradictory.
Shortly after the June 30 deadline,
and in some cases before the deadline, the
government initiated a coordinated campaign among
the Ministry of Transport and
Telecommunications, the criminal police, the
financial police and various government
agencies to shut down more than seventy-five
radio and television stations across Serbia
and confiscate some of their equipment without
warning, even though some of the stations
had submitted all of the necessary documentation.
All of the closed stations were either
independent, run by the opposition or commercial
and unconnected to the government.
On February 6, the government announced
another open bid for temporary radio and
television frequencies, even though it had never
replied to the bids submitted in June
1997. To apply for a bid, stations must meet
a number of criteria, such as be registered at
the Ministry of Information and Commercial Court,
have the proper licences for electronics
and construction, and provide an as-yet undisclosed
fee.
For more information about the media in FRY see the following sources:
Human Rights Watch report,
"Discouraging Democracy: Elections and Human Rights in Serbia", 12/96
Radio B92 website: http://www.opennet.org
ANEM website: http://207.10.94.56/anem
Committee to Protect
Journalists website: http://www.cpj.org
Press Now website: http://www.dds.nl/~pressnow
MedienHilfe website:
http://www.medienhilfe.ch
Helsinki Committee for
Human Rights in Serbia website http://www.helsinki.org.yu